bannerGovernment 03

Pechanga Gaming Commission

In 2002, the Pechanga Band spent nearly $18 million on gaming regulation and activity.

The Broad Scope of Tribal Gaming Regulation

Tribal Government gaming is subject to more stringent regulation and security controls, and at more levels, than any other type of gaming in the United States. Indian nations, like the Pechanga Band, that own and operate reservation casinos, have established their own gaming commissions and developed tribal police forces, security and surveillance departments and, in some instances, court systems, to develop and enforce proper regulations and internal controls and to combat crime.

The vital need for stringent regulation was determined well before the U.S. Government established operational standards. A decade ago, the California-Nevada Indian Gaming Association (now the California Nations Indian Gaming Association) promulgated comprehensive "California Indian Gaming Internal Control Guidelines" covering the whole range of casino activities ranging from the integrity of the games to related operations and personnel. These regulations met or exceeded standards adopted by states, such as Nevada and New Jersey.

The Pechanga Band, like many tribes, has invested heavily in high tech surveillance equipment and professional personnel to operate them. Because Class III-type gaming is a recently emerging industry, only new "state-of-the-art" electronic equipment and machines are in use. At the Pechanga Resort & Casino, the surveillance system is on par with any in the gaming industry and exceeds standards employed by commercial gaming operations. Tribal governments, by far, have more personnel regulating tribal casinos than gaming enterprises in other government jurisdictions.

No one has a greater interest in protecting the integrity of tribal government gaming on the Pechanga Reservation than the tribe itself. This is the most precious economic resource the tribe has had since before the Spanish arrived. As a result, the Pechanga Tribal Government, like other governments, is the frontline regulator of gaming within its territory, placing the highest priority on protecting tribal assets, insuring the integrity of gaming and assuring a safe, secure and healthful recreational and work environment for customers and employees.

In 2002, during the first year of operation of the PRC, the Pechanga Band spent in excess of $17.6 million to cover gaming regulation and related activities, including:

  • $2.4 million to operate the independent Pechanga Gaming Commission and direct regulatory activities
  • $185,000 for the Internal Audit Department
  • $9.5 million for Surveillance Department operations, regulatory payments to the state and federal governments
  • $5.3 million for the Public Safety Department.including a staff of more than 160 persons, including public safety officers, detectives, investigators, plus paramedics and emergency medical technicians

Tribal government gaming is subject to more stringent regulation and security controls, and at more levels than any other type of gaming in the United States.

Just as the State of California regulates the state lottery and horse racing and exercises regulatory oversight with local governments over card rooms and charitable bingo and related games, following federal law, the Pechanga Tribal Government and other Indian nations have established industry standards and internal controls.

Federal Law Restricts How Gaming Proceeds Are Used

Not only does federal law govern gaming regulation, it also restricts the use of tribal gaming revenues to specific functions. As mandated by Section 11 (a)(2)(B) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), net revenues from tribal government gaming may be used only:

  • To fund tribal government operations or programs.
  • To provide for the general welfare of the Native American tribe and its members (Indian governmental services and programs).
  • To promote tribal economic development.
  • For charitable causes.
  • To help fund operations of local governments.

Tribes accomplish these goals through decisions of democratically elected officials, just as a city council does in a municipality. Since IGRA allows only the tribal governments to enter into gaming — not individuals — tribal governments determine short- and long-range goals and plans for allocating the proceeds.

Like state governments, tribal governments use gaming revenues as required by IGRA — for law enforcement, gaming regulation, education, economic development, tribal courts and infrastructure and property improvement. Gaming profits fund tribal social service programs, scholarships, health and dental care, new roads, new sewer and water systems, adequate housing, chemical dependency treatment programs and senior care.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that states had no regulatory control over gaming conducted on Indian land (California v. Cabazon ). State governments reacted with alarm and Congress began development of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. In 1988, IGRA became law after tribes and states reached a compromise to give states unprecedented joint authority over tribal government gaming. This is achieved through tribal-state gaming compact negotiations, such as those affirmed by compacts, the contents of which were made legal by voter passage of Proposition 1A in California in March 2000. IGRA recognizes the right of tribes to conduct similar gaming on tribal land in states where such gaming is permitted outside the reservation for other purposes. IGRA also emphasizes the dire economic need of tribes, and gaming is one of the few revenue producing ventures that have generated income for tribal governments. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act creates three classes of tribal gaming:

Class I

Social games for prizes of minimal value or traditional forms of Indian gaming as part of tribal ceremonies or celebrations.

Class II

Bingo and related games, including pull tabs, lotto, punch boards, tip jars, instant bingo and some card games, excluding house banked card games.

Class III

All forms of gaming that are not Class I or Class II, including video lottery terminals, slot machines and house banked table games, like blackjack, roulette and dice games. Only Class III games require tribal-state compacts.

In 1994, the Pechanga General Council approved the Pechanga Gaming Ordinance, establishing the Pechanga Gaming Commission, and setting forth the duties and responsibilities of that regulatory authority.

The Pechanga Gaming Commission is charged with acting on behalf of the tribe in matters regarding the protection of gaming assets (money, facilities, services and equipment), as well as to protect customers, plus safeguard the integrity of the games from fraud or mismanagement.

Under tribal law, the Pechanga Gaming Commission has the responsibility to regulate all gaming activity on the Pechanga Reservation and also is responsible for submitting reports as required to the National Indian Gaming Commission. No activity relating to the operation of the Pechanga Resort & Casino is exempt from review and inspection by the Pechanga Gaming Commission, nor is any member of management or employee exempt from the provisions of the ordinance and regulations.

bannerGovernment 04

TRIBAL GOVERNMENT

A people of tradition, we do not let the sun rise or set without remembering who we are — the Pechanga People.

cultural flag

A Fully Functioning Modern Tribal Government

The Pechanga Band, also called the Luiseño (Spanish Missionaries), and for a time Mission (California English) Indians, has been a sovereign government since before the United States came into existence. The Pechanga Band derives its authority to govern from the General Membership. Original aboriginal lands expanded far out from the traditional Luiseño center of Temecula, California. Today, the 5,500-acre Pechanga Reservation is located near Temecula being east of Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South. The Pechanga Band of Indians, along with over 560 other tribal governments throughout the United States including over 100 tribes in California, is a federally recognized political jurisdiction with governmental authority over its reservation land and people, similar in scope and authority to states.

Government-to-Government Relationships

The United States has a mix of governments: federal, state and American Indian tribes or Alaska Native entities. The State of California, for instance, is sovereign to the extent that its powers are defined and limited by the Constitution of the United States as interpreted by the U.S. Congress and, ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court. The same holds for the sovereignty of tribal governments.

The United States government has a trust relationship with the Pechanga Band, acknowledging it as an "entity recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs." The Pechanga Band is further "acknowledged" by the United States Government to possess "immunities and privileges by virtue of (Pechanga's) government-to-government relationship with the United States as well as the responsibilities, powers, limitations and obligations" as a federally recognized tribe. With powers and authorities similar to states, the Pechanga Government has historic, constitutional and legal rights to self-governance and self-rule.

As with a state government, any power not expressly vested with the federal government resides with the Pechanga Government. The states do not in themselves determine the scope of any government-to-government relationship with Indian tribes, nor do federally recognized tribes come under any control by a state government and its political subdivisions (cities, counties and special districts) unless expressly authorized by the United States Congress.

As citizens of the United States, as well as the Pechanga Band, the Pechanga people honor the laws and obligations of all Americans.

Courts Have Long Recognized American Indian Tribal Governments as Sovereign

Historically, state governments — including California — have been hostile to the concept of recognizing and dealing with tribes as governments of equal stature. Under the Constitution of the United States and through numerous treaties and court decisions, the federal government undertook the task to protect tribes from the states, who have often coveted Native American lands and assets and sought to impose their will on Indian tribes and people.

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized tribal sovereignty in court decisions for over 170 years. In 1831, the Supreme Court decided, in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, that Indian nations had the full legal right to manage their own affairs, govern themselves internally and engage in legal and political relationships with the federal government and its subdivisions. In California v. Cabazon (1987), the Supreme Court upheld the right of tribes, as sovereign nations, to conduct gaming on Indian lands, free of state control when similar gaming outside the reservation is permitted by the state for any purpose.

The sovereignty was further recognized — while at the same time infringed upon — by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act passed by Congress in 1988. The act affirms that tribes have the power to conduct gaming on Indian lands, but it gives the states the ability to negotiate gaming regulation and games played through the signing of tribal-state compacts for Class III (casino-type) games.

Pechanga Government Structure

Today, the Pechanga Band of Indians is a fully functioning, modern government. The Pechanga people govern by a constitution and bylaws, and the tribal government is two-tiered. Elected by a majority of the General Membership, the Pechanga Tribal Council is responsible for setting policy and administering a wide range of governmental programs within the boundaries of the reservation. The seven-member Pechanga Tribal Council is elected every two years. The General Membership also elects the tribal secretary, tribal treasurer and members and officers of the Pechanga Development Corporation and Pechanga Gaming Commission.

Federal Recognition

Not just any group of Native Americans can be recognized as a sovereign American Indian nation. There are strict laws and lengthy processes to establish that an Indian community was and is a historic Indian nation recognized as sovereign by the federal government of the United States. Today, tribes have a formalized government-to government relationship with the United States as they obtain "federally recognized status."

Some Indian nations were recognized in the 18th and 19th centuries. A few, decimated by war, or having made treaties with English colonists prior to the existence of the United States, were overlooked by the U.S. in granting formal "federal recognition" as they clung tenaciously to remote corners of their aboriginal homelands, culture, traditions and inherent sovereignty.

Recognition can happen in only two ways: an Act of Congress recognizes the tribe, or any unrecognized tribe undertakes the lengthy and complex Federal Recognition Process through the Department of the Interior. As a result of an Act of Congress, the Pechanga Band is recognized as a sovereign government having a government-to-government relationship with the U.S. government. Accordingly, the Pechanga Band is afforded U.S. Constitutional protections.

Each Tribe Determines Its Membership

By right, sovereign governments define who its citizen-members are. In the United States, Native American tribes, as sovereign nations, set their own requirements and parameters for membership. In a sense, many Native Americans possess something akin to dual citizenship. They are citizens of the United States, a sovereign nation, and also members of their respective tribes, also sovereign nations.

Pechanga is committed to bettering the lives of its people and the surrounding communities.

Learn more about our charitable contributions

We look forward to great growth and diversification of our tribal economy.
Learn more

Page 2 of 2

Pechanga Documentary video

Documentary1

Pu’éska Documentary video

Watch The Mountain That Weeps